
America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023
Each year millions of Americans are prescribed physical therapy while recovering from surgery, treating chronic conditions or healing from illnesses or injuries. Inpatient physical rehabilitation facilities are often used for patients recuperating from the most severe illnesses or injuries. These centers provide intensive therapy with multidisciplinary teams of medical professionals. Research shows that physical therapy following surgery reduces recovery time. Additionally, patients treated with physical therapy experience reduced pain and improved mobility, which results in better function.
There are more than 1,000 inpatient physical rehabilitation centers in the United States, giving us more choices than ever before. Newsweek and the global market research and consumer data firm Statista are proud to announce our ranking of America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers for the fourth year.
This award recognizes 280 leading inpatient rehabilitation facilities in the United States based on a survey of experts, quality metrics and accreditation data. Survey participants were also given an opportunity to specify standout programs in areas like rehabilitation for amputation, brain injury, cancer, spinal cord injury or stroke.
We hope this ranking is useful in your search for the best care options available.

- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Alabama
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Arizona
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Arkansas
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - California
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Colorado
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Florida
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Georgia
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Illinois
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Indiana
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Kansas
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Kentucky
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Louisiana
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Michigan
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Midwest
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Missouri
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - New York
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - North Carolina
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Northeast
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Ohio
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Oklahoma
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Pennsylvania
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - South
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - South Carolina
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Tennessee
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Texas
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Virginia
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Washington
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - West
- America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 - Wisconsin
If your facility was listed in the ranking, click here to learn more about the licensing options.
METHODOLOGY
The America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2023 ranking awards the leading inpatient physical rehabilitation facilities in the U.S. The centers were identified according to the definition of inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). IRFs are freestanding rehabilitation hospitals and rehabilitation units in acute care hospitals. Centers that offer outpatient physical rehabilitation services only were excluded. A few facilities which provide inpatient rehabilitation services but are not included in the CMS IRF data were also considered.
Physical rehabilitation centers from the 25 states with the highest number of centers were included in the survey:
AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MI, MO, NC, NY, OH, OK, PA, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WI.
All remaining states were divided into four regions for the survey:
Northeast: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, RI, VT
Midwest: IA, MN, ND, NE, SD
West: AK, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WY
South: DC, DE, MD, MS, WV
THE RANKING IS BASED ON THREE DATA SOURCES:
Participants were asked to recommend the top ten physical rehabilitation centers from their respective states. Recommendations for their own employers were not allowed.
For each recommended physical rehabilitation facility, participants also were asked to assess the quality of care (e.g., treatments/ therapies, consultation with doctor/ therapist), service (e.g., meals, leisure activities), follow-up care (e.g., outpatient therapies) and accommodation and amenities (e.g., size of room, quality of furnishing).
Participants were also able to specify a standout program (amputation, brain injury, cancer rehabilitation, spinal cord injury, stroke) for the recommended physical rehabilitation center. Rehabilitation centers that received several recommendations for one of the standout programs receive this additional designation.
2. Quality metrics data for IRFs published by CMS.
3. Accreditation data on physical rehabilitation centers provided by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) and the Model Systems Knowledge Translation Center (MSKTC).
SCORING MODEL:
A total score was calculated for each physical rehabilitation center. The total score was composed of:
Reputation score (45 percent of the total score)
Quality metrics score (45 percent of the total score)
Accreditation score (5 percent of the total score)
Model systems score (5 percent of the total score)
REPUTATION SCORE:
The reputation score is 45 percent of the total score. 80 percent of the reputation score is based on expert recommendations in the survey. Recommendations that were stated as the best facility a facility was the best in a state received a 33 percent higher weight than recommendations for the fifth best. Additionally, the professional experience of the participant was taken into account. A score was assigned to each facility based on the number of weighted recommendations.
The quality score is based on assessments given by the medical experts in the survey and constitutes 20 percent of the reputation score. For each recommended physical rehabilitation facility, participants were asked to assess the quality of:
Care (e.g., treatments/ therapies, consultation with doctor/ therapist)
Service (e.g., meals, leisure activities)
Follow-up care (e.g., outpatient therapies)
Accommodation & amenities (e.g., size of room, quality of furnishing)
QUALITY METRICS SCORE:
45 percent of the overall score comes from the quality metrics score calculated for each facility.
Quality metrics data is published by CMS. These quality metrics are risk-standardized quality measures, allowing for a comparison of facilities regarding the quality of treatment and medical conditions, even if the patient groups are varying. For each of the 16 quality metrics reported by CMS, a sub-score was calculated.
The facility which achieved the best result in one individual measure (e.g., lowest infection rate or highest influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel) received 100 percent for the respective sub-score.
The weighted sub-scores were used to calculate the total quality metrics score.
ACCREDITATIONS SCORE:
The accreditation score is 5 percent of the total score.
CARF International is a nonprofit organization assigning voluntary accreditation for U.S. IRFs. To receive accreditation, facilities must commit to quality improvement, focus on the unique needs of each person the provider serves and monitor service outcomes.
The following specialty programs were included in the scoring model: amputation, brain injury, cancer rehabilitation, spinal cord injury, and stroke. Facilities receive a 2.5 percent bonus to their score if they have CARF accreditation and 0.5 percent for each specialty program (maximum 2.5 percent).
MODEL SYSTEMS SCORE:
The model systems score is 5 percent of the total score.
Model Systems are funded by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). These specialized programs of care are available in the areas of spinal cord injury (SCI), traumatic brain injury (TBI) and burn injury. The aim is to provide high-quality research and patient care to improve the health and overall quality of life of people with TBI, SCI and burn injuries. Facilities receive a 5 percent bonus if they have one or more model system designations awarded by NIDILRR.
DISCLAIMER
The rankings are comprised exclusively of physical rehabilitation centers that are eligible regarding the scope described in this document. A mention in the ranking is a positive recognition based on peer recommendations. The ranking is the result of an elaborate process which, due to the interval of data-collection and analysis, reflects the last 12 months only. Furthermore, any events preceding and following the period June 15, 2022 – June 15, 2023, and/or pertaining to individual persons affiliated/associated to the facilities were not considered in the metrics. As such, the results of this ranking should not be used as the sole source of information for future deliberations.
The information provided in this ranking should be considered in conjunction with other available information about physical rehabilitation centers or, if possible, accompanied by a visit to the facility. The quality of physical rehabilitation centers that are not included in the rankings is not disputed.
ABOUT STATISTA R
Statista R is a world leader in the creation of company, brand, and product rankings, based on comprehensive market research and data analysis.
With a team of over 100 expert analysts and partnerships with more than 50 media publications across all continents, Statista creates transparency for consumers and helps companies build trust and recognition across a plethora of industries and product categories.
Please visit r.statista.com for further information about Statista R and our rankings.
Download the full methodology here.