America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2024

America's Best
Physical Rehabilitation Centers 2024

Physical rehabilitation centers provide around-the-clock care for people suffering from complex illnesses and injuries. These facilities offer intensive treatments for a variety of ailments, from neurological conditions like strokes to orthopedic problems like fractures.

While staying at inpatient rehabilitation centers, patients receive hands-on treatment that can drastically improve their quality of life. Multidisiciplinary teams—which typically include physical and occupational therapists—work to reduce patients' symptoms and equip them for life after discharge.

There are more than 1,100 of these facilities in the United States, so identifying the best fit can prove challenging. To help patients weigh their options, Newsweek has partnered with data intelligence platform Statista to rank America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers.

The annual list, now in its fifth edition, awards the top 300 inpatient physical rehabilitation facilities in the U.S. Each center was assigned a score based on quality metrics, accreditation data, a national survey of industry experts and Google reviews from patients.

To help patients narrow their search further, centers were sorted by geographic area. The 25 states with the most facilities were ranked individually, and facilities from the remaining states were grouped into four regions.

These physical rehabilitation centers are the best of the best for patients.

Nancy Cooper Signature 5
RankFacilityCityStateStandout Program
1
Birmingham
Alabama
2
Mobile
Alabama
3
Huntsville
Alabama
4
Gadsden
Alabama
5
Phenix City
Alabama
1
Chandler
Arizona
2
Scottsdale
Arizona
3
Tucson
Arizona
4
Peoria
Arizona
5
Tuscon
Arizona
1
Little Rock
Arkansas
2
Rogers
Arkansas
3
Fort Smith
Arkansas
4
Hot Springs
Arkansas
5
Fayetteville
Arkansas
6
Conway
Arkansas
1
San Francisco
California
Spinal Cord Injury, Stroke
2
Los Angeles
California
Brain Injury, Spinal Cord, Stroke
3
Los Angeles
California
4
Los Angeles
California
5
Loma Linda
California
6
Vallejo
California
7
Los Angeles
California
8
Oakland
California
Brain Injury
9
Downey
California
10
Alhambra
California
11
Santa Barbara
California
12
San Jose
California
13
Murrieta
California
14
Roseville
California
15
Los Gatos
California
16
Orange
California
17
Arcadia
California
18
Bakersfield
California
19
Mission Viejo
California
20
Glendale
California
21
Salinas
California
22
Bakersfield
California
23
San Diego
California
24
Escondido
California
1
Aurora
Colorado
2
Colorado Springs
Colorado
Stroke
3
Aurora
Colorado
4
Denver
Colorado
5
Englewood
Colorado
6
Littleton
Colorado
7
Denver
Colorado
8
Lakewood
Colorado
1
Jacksonville
Florida
Stroke
2
Miami
Florida
Spinal Cord Injury
3
Daytona Beach
Florida
Brain Injury, Spinal Cord Injury
4
Orlando
Florida
Stroke
5
Hollywood
Florida
6
Gainesville
Florida
7
Miami
Florida
8
Miami Beach
Florida
Spinal Cord Injury
9
St. Petersburg
Florida
Spinal Cord Injury
10
Fort Myers
Florida
11
Orlando
Florida
12
Tampa
Florida
13
Sarasota
Florida
14
Brooksville
Florida
15
Deerfield Beach
Florida
16
Jacksonville
Florida
17
Sanford
Florida
18
Lakeland
Florida
19
Boynton Beach
Florida
20
Aventura
Florida
21
Jacksonville
Florida
22
Tampa
Florida
Brain Injury
1
Atlanta
Georgia
2
Macon
Georgia
3
Savannah
Georgia
4
Decatur
Georgia
5
Snellville
Georgia
6
Newnan
Georgia
7
Athens
Georgia
1
Chicago
Illinois
Amputation, Brain Injury, Spinal Cord, Stroke
2
Aurora
Illinois
Brain Injury, Spinal Cord, Stroke
3
Elk Grove Village
Illinois
Stroke
4
Arlington Heights
Illinois
Brain Injury, Stroke
5
Chicago
Illinois
Stroke
6
Oak Lawn
Illinois
7
Park Ridge
Illinois
Stroke
8
Chicago
Illinois
Stroke
9
La Grange
Illinois
10
Libertyville
Illinois
1
Indianapolis
Indiana
2
Crown Point
Indiana
3
Greenwood
Indiana
4
Indianapolis
Indiana
5
Hobart
Indiana
6
Newburgh
Indiana
7
Mishawaka
Indiana
1
Kansas City
Kansas
2
Overland Park
Kansas
3
Topeka
Kansas
4
Overland Park
Kansas
5
Wichita
Kansas
1
Lexington
Kentucky
2
Owensboro
Kentucky
3
Florence
Kentucky
4
Louisville
Kentucky
Spinal Cord Injury
5
Edgewood
Kentucky
1
Baton Rouge
Louisiana
2
Jefferson
Louisiana
Stroke
3
New Orleans
Louisiana
4
Baton Rouge
Louisiana
Stroke
5
New Iberia
Louisiana
6
Alexandria
Louisiana
7
Baton Rouge
Louisiana
8
New Orleans
Louisiana
9
Hammond
Louisiana
10
Lafayette
Louisiana
11
Lafayette
Louisiana
12
Alexandria
Louisiana
1
Grand Rapids
Michigan
Spinal Cord Injury
2
Ann Arbor
Michigan
Cancer Rehabilitation, Spinal Cord
3
Royal Oak
Michigan
Cancer Rehabilitation, Stroke
4
Rochester
Michigan
5
Clinton Township
Michigan
Amputation
6
Detroit
Michigan
7
Grand Rapids
Michigan
Stroke
8
Farmington Hills
Michigan
9
Wyandotte
Michigan
10
Bay City
Michigan
11
Warren
Michigan
1
Minneapolis
Midwest - Minnesota
2
Coralville
Midwest - Iowa
3
St Paul
Midwest - Minnesota
4
Rochester
Midwest - Minnesota
5
Omaha
Midwest - Nebraska
6
Minneapolis
Midwest - Minnesota
7
Clive
Midwest - Iowa
8
Kearney
Midwest - Nebraska
9
Omaha
Midwest - Nebraska
10
Coralville
Midwest - Iowa
1
Chesterfield
Missouri
Stroke
2
Springfield
Missouri
3
St. Louis
Missouri
4
Columbia
Missouri
5
Cameron
Missouri
6
St. Louis
Missouri
7
Cape Girardeau
Missouri
1
New York
New York
Brain Injury, Stroke
2
New York
New York
Brain Injury, Cancer Rehabilitation
3
New York
New York
4
New York
New York
5
New York
New York
6
Glen Cove
New York
7
Syracuse
New York
8
Bronx
New York
9
White Plains
New York
10
Staten Island
New York
11
Rochester
New York
1
Raleigh
North Carolina
2
Winston-Salem
North Carolina
3
Charlotte
North Carolina
4
New Bern
North Carolina
5
Hillsborough
North Carolina
6
Pinehurst
North Carolina
7
Charlotte
North Carolina
8
Winston-Salem
North Carolina
Amputation
1
Madison
Northeast - New Jersey
2
West Orange
Northeast - New Jersey
3
Portland
Northeast - Maine
4
Plainsboro
Northeast - New Jersey
5
Charlestown
Northeast - Massachusetts
Brain Injury, Spinal Cord
6
Milford
Northeast - Connecticut
7
East Sandwich
Northeast - Massachusetts
8
Woburn
Northeast - Massachusetts
9
Bridgeport
Northeast - Connecticut
10
Hartford
Northeast - Connecticut
1
Avon
Ohio
Spinal Cord Injury, Stroke
2
Columbus
Ohio
Brain Injury, Spinal Cord
3
Avon
Ohio
4
Beachwood
Ohio
5
Toledo
Ohio
6
Cleveland
Ohio
Brain Injury, Stroke
7
Akron
Ohio
8
Dayton
Ohio
9
Parma
Ohio
10
Cincinnati
Ohio
11
Cincinnati
Ohio
12
Westerville
Ohio
13
Columbus
Ohio
1
Oklahoma City
Oklahoma
2
Tulsa
Oklahoma
3
Oklahoma City
Oklahoma
4
Tulsa
Oklahoma
5
Enid
Oklahoma
1
Lancaster
Pennsylvania
2
Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania
3
Philadelphia
Pennsylvania
4
Elkins Park
Pennsylvania
Brain Injury
5
Philadelphia
Pennsylvania
6
Scranton
Pennsylvania
7
Malvern
Pennsylvania
8
Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania
9
Wilkes-Barre
Pennsylvania
10
Danville
Pennsylvania
11
Reading
Pennsylvania
12
New Castle
Pennsylvania
13
Erie
Pennsylvania
14
Hummelstown
Pennsylvania
15
Allentown
Pennsylvania
16
York
Pennsylvania
17
Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania
18
Johnstown
Pennsylvania
19
York
Pennsylvania
20
Mechanicsburg
Pennsylvania
1
Washington
South - DC
Stroke
2
Baltimore
South - Maryland
3
Washington
South - DC
4
Wilmington
South - Delware
Stroke
5
Rockville
South - Maryland
6
Middletown
South - Delware
1
Charleston
South Carolina
Stroke
2
Columbia
South Carolina
3
Anderson
South Carolina
4
Mount Pleasant
South Carolina
5
Greenwood
South Carolina
6
Charleston
South Carolina
7
Spartanburg
South Carolina
1
Germantown
Tennessee
2
Franklin
Tennessee
3
Johnson City
Tennessee
4
Nashville
Tennessee
5
Nashville
Tennessee
6
Nashville
Tennessee
7
Nashville
Tennessee
1
Dallas
Texas
2
Austin
Texas
3
Irving
Texas
4
Austin
Texas
Stroke
5
Dallas
Texas
Stroke
6
Houston
Texas
Stroke
7
Houston
Texas
Brain Injury, Spinal Cord, Stroke
8
Sugar Land
Texas
9
Fort Worth
Texas
10
Dallas
Texas
11
Dallas
Texas
12
Houston
Texas
13
Pearland
Texas
14
Fort Worth
Texas
Brain Injury, Stroke
15
Dallas
Texas
16
The Woodlands
Texas
Stroke
17
Frisco
Texas
18
San Antonio
Texas
Stroke
19
Houston
Texas
20
Houston
Texas
21
Lubbock
Texas
22
San Antonio
Texas
23
Dallas
Texas
Brain Injury, Cancer Rehabilitation, Spinal Cord, Stroke
24
Arlington
Texas
25
Katy
Texas
26
Keller
Texas
27
Plano
Texas
28
Dallas
Texas
Stroke
29
Sugar Land
Texas
30
San Antonio
Texas
31
Mesquite
Texas
32
Richardson
Texas
33
Corpus Christi
Texas
34
Houston
Texas
35
Arlington
Texas
1
Charlottesville
Virginia
2
Alexandria
Virginia
3
Fairfax
Virginia
4
Richmond
Virginia
5
Virginia Beach
Virginia
6
Fredericksburg
Virginia
7
Aldie
Virginia
1
Tacoma
Washington
2
Seattle
Washington
Spinal Cord Injury
3
Sedro-Woolley
Washington
4
Seattle
Washington
5
Kirkland
Washington
6
Seattle
Washington
1
Casper
West - Wyoming
2
South Ogden
West - Utah
3
Las Cruces
West - New Mexico
4
Eugene
West - Oregon
5
Salt Lake City
West - Utah
6
Sandy
West - Utah
Stroke
7
Anchorage
West - Alaska
8
Billings
West - Montana
9
Murray
West - Utah
Stroke
10
Honolulu
West - Hawaii
11
Las Vegas
West - Nevada
12
Las Vegas
West - Nevada
13
Las Vegas
West - Nevada
14
Post Falls
West - Idaho
15
Albuquerque
West - New Mexico
1
Madison
Wisconsin
2
Waukesha
Wisconsin
3
Summit
Wisconsin
4
Milwaukee
Wisconsin
5
La Crosse
Wisconsin
6
Oshkosh
Wisconsin

LICENSING:

If your facility was listed in the ranking, click here to learn more about licensing options.

METHODOLOGY

The 5th edition of America's Best Physical Rehabilitation Centers ranking awards the leading 300 inpatient physical rehabilitation facilities in the U.S. The physical rehabilitation centers were identified according to the definition of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRFs) by CMS. IRFs are free standing rehabilitation hospitals and rehabilitation units in acute care hospitals. Centers which offer outpatient physical rehabilitation services only were excluded.

The 25 states with the most facilities according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) were ranked individually:

AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, FL, GA, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MI, MO, NY, NC, OH, OK, PA, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WI.

The facilities from the remaining states were grouped into 4 regions: Northeast, Midwest, West and South.

THE RANKING IS BASED ON FOUR PILLARS:

1. Quality metrics data for IRFs published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

2. National online survey: From April to May 2024, Statista in cooperation with Newsweek conducted an online survey among experts with knowledge of physical rehabilitation centers (physicians, physiotherapists, doctors, clinic managers and other health care professionals).

Participants were asked to recommend the Top 10 physical rehabilitation centers from their respective state. Recommendations for their own employers were not allowed.

For each recommended physical rehabilitation facility, participants also were asked to assess the quality of care, quality of service quality of follow-up care, accommodation and amenities.

Participants were also able to specify a standout program (amputation, brain injury, cancer rehabilitation, spinal cord injury, stroke) for the recommended physical rehabilitation center.

3. Accreditation data on physical rehabilitation centers provided by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) and the Model Systems Knowledge Translation Center (MSKTC)

4. Google reviews as a proxy for patient satisfaction

SCORING MODEL:

A total score was calculated for each physical rehabilitation center. The total score was composed of:

● Quality metrics score (50% of the total score)

● Reputation score (35% of the total score)

● Accreditation score (each program 5% of the total score)

● Google reviews (5% of the total score)

QUALITY METRICS SCORE:

50% of the overall score comes from the quality metrics score calculated for each facility.

Quality metrics data is published by CMS. These quality metrics are risk-standardized quality measures, allowing for a comparison of facilities regarding quality of treatment and medical conditions, even if the patient groups are varying. For each of the sixteen quality metrics reported by CMS, a sub-score was calculated.

The facility which achieved the best result in one individual measure (e.g., lowest infection rate or highest influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel) received 100% for the respective sub-score.

The weighted sub-scores were used to calculate the total quality metrics score.

REPUTATION SCORE:

The reputation score is 35% of the total score. 80% of the reputation score is based on expert recommendations in the survey. The order of the recommendations is important for the weighting of the recommendations. Additionally, the professional experience of the participant was taken into account. A score was assigned to each facility based on the number of weighted recommendations.

A quality score based on the expert assessments in the survey constitute 20% of the reputation score. For each recommended physical rehabilitation facility, participants were asked to assess the quality of:

● Care (e.g., treatments/ therapies, consultation with doctor/ therapist)

● Service (e.g., meals, leisure activities)

● Follow-up care (e.g., outpatient therapies)

● Accommodation & amenities (e.g., size of room, quality of furnishing)

ACCREDITATIONS SCORE:

CARF International is a nonprofit organization assigning voluntary accreditation for U.S. IRFs. To receive accreditation, facilities must commit to quality improvement, focus on the unique needs of each person the provider serves and monitor service outcomes.

The following specialty programs were included in the scoring model: amputation, brain injury, cancer rehabilitation, spinal cord injury, and stroke. The CARF accreditation score constitutes 5% of the total score and considers the general accreditation as well as the accreditations for the specialty programs.

Model Systems are funded by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). These specialized programs of care are available in the areas of spinal cord injury (SCI), traumatic brain Injury (TBI) and burn injury. The aim is to provide high quality research and patient care to improve the health and overall quality of life of people with TBI, SCI and burn injuries. Facilities are eligible for the Model systems score of 5% if they have one or more model system designations awarded by NIDILRR.

GOOGLE REVIEWS:

Google reviews were included as a new pillar in the scoring as a proxy for patient satisfaction. It constitutes 5% to the total score.

Disclaimer

The rankings are comprised exclusively of physical rehabilitation centers that are eligible regarding the scope described in this document. A mention in the ranking is a positive recognition based on peer recommendations and accreditations. The ranking is the result of an elaborate process which, due to the interval of data-collection and analysis, reflects the last 12 months only. Furthermore, any events preceding or following the period June 19, 2023 – July 5, 2024, and/or pertaining to individual persons affiliated/associated to the facilities were not included in the metrics. As such, the results of this ranking should not be used as the sole source of information for future deliberations.

The information provided in this ranking should be considered in conjunction with other available information about physical rehabilitation centers or, if possible, accompanied by a visit to a facility. The quality of physical rehabilitation centers that are not included in the rankings is not disputed.

About Statista R

Statista R is a world leader in the creation of company, brand, and product rankings and top lists, based on comprehensive market research and data analysis: Statista R recognizes the best. With a team of over 100 expert analysts and in cooperation with more than 40 high profile media brands across all continents, Statista R creates transparency for consumers and business decision makers and helps companies build trust and recognition across a plethora of industries and product categories. Visit r.statista.com for further information about Statista R and our rankings.

Statista R is a division of Statista. The leading data and business intelligence portal provides an extensive collection of statistics, reports, and insights on over 80,000 topics from 22,500 sources in 170 industries. Find out more at statista.com.

Download the full methodology here.